Friday, 19 August 2022  
How many of the 1500 asylum seeker lives lost at sea since 2001 could have been saved?
Zahra (6), Fatima (7) and Eman (9) - the daughters of Sondos Ismail and Ahmed Alzalimi -  three of the 146 children who lost their lives when the vessel that has become known as SIEVX foundered in international waters en route to Christmas Island on 19 October 2001.
   SIEVX Comment
   The Disaster
   Abu Quassey
   Khaleed Daoed
   Maythem Radhi
   People Smuggling
   Not the First?
   Two Brothers
   CMI Index
   Hansard Extracts
  SIEV 358-Kaniva
  SAR 2012/5710
  SAR 2013/3821
Search with Google


by Marg Hutton
20 July 2003

'90East helps ASIO ferret out spies and subversive elements. "There's a process established by which we inform our highly protected customers of what's going on and give them as much information as possible."'

Brian Denehy, quoted by Paul Ham in
'The Men who hold off Canberra's cyber siege', SMH, 3 December 2002

Last December we were proud to announce that is now being archived twice a year by the National Library of Australia which downloads our entire site to preserve it for future scholarship.

More recently we have discovered that a significant proportion of is being downloaded every night by government watchdogs - either an as yet unknown government department or the outsourced private company that handles its internet security (

It is one thing to surmise that is probably being regularly monitored by one or more of Australia's national security agencies - it is another thing to now be sure that this is actually happening, to learn how comprehensive and frequent it is, and to read about the somewhat disturbing company in which we have apparently been categorised. We explain below (with some unavoidable technical detail) what we recently discovered and how.

How we found out we were being swept by or one of its government clients

Over the last few months we have noticed a sharp increase in traffic to from computers identified by two IP numbers -, also known as and, also known as (IP stands for Internet protocol - an IP number or address is the unique number of each computer connected to the Internet)

The increase was so dramatic - upwards of 600 hits per day from the first IP number - that we decided to investigate further.

On examining our logs we discovered an interesting pattern - every morning in the wee small hours, at exactly 1.42 or 1.43am, is visited by the first IP number which stays for around three hours and sweeps the website, downloading and/or scanning a significant proportion of our files - about 600 every visit. Later in the morning on weekdays it returns and examines about half a dozen pages - the ones that have been added, edited or linked during the previous day.

We can see how this could be useful for government agencies interested in our work - to get a daily update on any new material we put up. Essentially it is the same job that Media Monitors, a press clipping service, does. The difference is that Media Monitors acts in a transparent manner and declares which newspapers and journals it monitors.

Here is a list of some of the activity on by ( during the last week:

Over the last year has received an astonishing 50,000 hits in total from these two IP numbers.

Not surprisingly we began to wonder about who and might be and why they are so interested in

Using Google we were able to establish an incidental link between the second IP number and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) from a posting to a message board by someone using an AFP email address which was posted from a computer with the same IP address.

Using the web detection tools publicly available at we were also able to discover that both IP numbers supposedly originate from the Department of Primary Industries and Energy. (see screen dumps 1 and 2)

But the Department of Primary Industries and Energy no longer exists - it is now the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia.

When we did a 'who is' on the IP numbers (found doing a reverse DNS check) of government departments that might be interested in surveillance of, such as ASIO, the Attorney Generals and the AFP, they all showed up as the 'Department of Primary Industries and Energy'. (see for example screen dumps 3 and 4) So ASIO or AFP computers may well show up on web logs as being from the Department of Primary Industries and Energy, just like our regular visitors to

And these government departments have another characteristic in common.

The technical contact for the internet domains of all these departments is listed as Brian V. Denehy of, a private internet security company. 'handles web security for ASIO, the cabinet office and most government departments.' 'ASIO... is one of several "highly protected clients who are grouped together in a single cluster"' 'Former Defence Signals Directorate and Australian Defence Force Academy experts manage the little private company'. (Ham, op. cit.) hosts a wide range of government departments. Most departments hosted by them appear to have their mail servers on (which appears to be an alternative for or an earlier incarnation of The home link of does not explain what SGE is, but instead shows two pretentious quotes about war and intelligence gathering:

"Thus it is said that one who knows the enemy and knows himself will not be endangered in a hundred engagements. One who does not know the enemy but knows himself will sometimes be victorious, sometimes meet with defeat. One who knows neither the enemy nor himself will invariably be defeated in every engagement."
-Sun Tzu, Chou Dynasty: Warring States period of China (circa 403 BC)

"Where it is possible to guard against a foreseeable risk which, though perhaps not great, nevertheless cannot be called remote or fanciful, by adopting means which involves little difficulty or expense, the failure to adopt such means will in general be negligent."
-Chief Justice Gibbs of the High Court: Turner v The State of South Australia (1982).

Why all this assiduous intellingence gathering on

Government ministers have consistently played down the concerns raised about the SIEVX affair implying that there is no genuine cause for alarm about the sinking of SIEVX and that those who do have concerns have overly fertile imaginations. Yet the government or its security advisers are closely and expensively monitoring this website.

Perhaps the reason for this is the high profile work of SIEVX advocate Tony Kevin. As a former senior Australian Diplomat, Tony Kevin is a highly credible spokesperson, attracting regular attention in the mainstream media, keeping the issue and questions about possible government complicity in the public eye.

While the website and Tony Kevin are quite separate, our work is complementary. So perhaps the government is keeping a close eye on in order to keep up with what Tony Kevin and this website may reveal next.

When Tony Kevin heard of this scrutiny of, he said:

"We are neither spies nor subversive elements. We are seeking to help uphold in Australia well-accepted principles of the rule of law, equal justice for all, and respect for the Senate's powers of independent review and scrutiny of government. There is nothing remotely subversive about these goals. Our pursuit of the truth of how SIEVX sank and how Australian national security agencies are helping to cover up aspects of the SIEVX history is entirely consistent with these principles."

Once again, we must ask the question - if the Australian Government has nothing to hide in relation to its handling of the SIEVX tragedy, why is it so worried that it has to keep daily tabs on what we are doing?


See also: ( 12851) | ©Copyright Marg Hutton ~ / 2002-2014